What do you think about the outcome of the 2000 Grammy Awards?

First Page - Previous - Next - Last - Add Entry - Other Topics - Message Boards - Exit Page 7 of 50 Submitted by Nadia from Fairborn Ohio USA Date: Wed Mar 8 18:56:06 2000 I thought the Grammys were ok and could have been much better, except for one thing. What is up with Santana being up for both Pop and Rock! I think that if they had of stayed in the Rock category, since that is what they are, then the Backstreet Boys would have one. Don't get me wrong, Santana is great, but we all konw when most of the people voting are about 30, then of course they are going to pick Santana. I think they need to get way more people below 30 voting. Either that or create another Pop category and allow the viewers to choose. Oh and we can't forget about Jennifer Lopez's..uh...dress. Yeah, that's it. Since when did drapes become clothing. Not only was it trashy, but it was ugly! What was she thinking?? Submitted by Manna from Bolton Canada Date: Wed Mar 8 18:55:07 2000 It's not fair BSB didn't win an award cause they are obviously the best and most talented band out there!!! I don't know how Santana could beat them! I love the new song they performed it was awesome!!! They did a great job as back up singers for Elton John too. Submitted by Brittany from Somewhere in the USA Date: Wed Mar 8 17:48:01 2000 I don't think Santana should have won all of those awards!! BSB is way better, and all those old people who voted picked Santana just because he goes way back. I think BSB should have AT LEAST gotten Song Of The Year and Album Of The Year. Next year, they are going to go home with a lot more grammys!! Submitted by jennifer mcgrattan from middle village new york usa Date: Wed Mar 8 15:01:10 2000 santana shouldn't have won all of those awards! The backsteeetboys were totally ripped off! They deserve at least two awards! Submitted by Janette from Houston TX USA Date: Wed Mar 8 13:24:13 2000 The guys lost to Sting and Santana! If you're going to lose to anyone, it's definetley Sting and Santana. The guys didn't have a chance against them. Submitted by ANGEL AJ'S GIRL from LA U.S. Date: Wed Mar 8 12:52:50 2000 I KNOW MY BOY'S SHOULD HAVE WON A GRAMMY BECAUSE LAST YEAR WHEN I WENT I SAT A FEW ROWS BEHIND THEM AND WHEN THEY LOST FOR BEST NEW ARTIST THE LOOK THAT AJ HAD ON HIS FACE WAS UNBELIVABLE AND I HEARD SOMEONE SAY NEXT YEAR GUY'S SO NOW IT'S THAT TIME AND BSB SHOULD OF WON AT LEAST ALBUM OF THE YEAR.SO I'M NOT GONNA SAY NEXT YEAR GUY'S BECAUSE I KNOW IN MY HEART THAT BACKSTREET WON ALL THOSE DAMMMM AWARDS.(SANTANA WHO???????) Submitted by Jennifer Woods from Smyrna SC USA Date: Wed Mar 8 11:07:09 2000 I think BSB deserved everything they were nominated for! Santana needs to go back to the 70's where he came from! BSB performances were very very good. Submitted by cheryll from chesapeake va usa Date: Wed Mar 8 00:09:20 2000 One comment: STING won for best POP album of the year??!! (I'm STILL scratching my head over that one!!) Submitted by helen from lakewood ohio US ofA Date: Tue Mar 7 21:33:11 2000 i think that it was soooooo unfair that the backstreet boys didn't win any gammys! i mean, c'mon! santana hasen't had a hit of his own in thirty years!he doesn't even sing! he plays the guitar while other people sing, and he gets all the credit! the bsb guiter player isn't taking all the credit! santana didn't even write the song "smoothe" i know bsb don't write all of their songs, but they're younger, and at least they're trying to!thanx 4 ur time! ktbspa! hugs kises & cookies! (i won't lie, i got that from howie) * * * * * * -TPrincess3000 * * * * * * Submitted by Ashley from Phoenix Arizona U.S. Date: Tue Mar 7 21:05:10 2000 yeah so far this is kelw! First Page - Previous - Next - Last - Add Entry - Other Topics - Message Boards - Exit Page 7 of 50